|
World physicians’ forum demands probe in Iraq war civilian toll
By: Farhan Zaidi
PARIS, France: International group of
top public-health physicians has termed the official toll of civilian
dead from the Iraq war as a serious miscalculate demanding an
independent probe to establish the full casualty figures.
Their statement published this Saturday in the weekly British Medical
Journal (BMJ) as the second anniversary of the war looms on March 20.
It marks a fresh attempt by medical campaigners to establish the
number of Iraqi civilian casualties after a rough estimate of 100,000
dead, made by epidemiologists last October, was brushed aside by the
British government.
"Monitoring casualties is a humanitarian imperative," the statement
said. "Understanding the causes of death is a core public-health
responsibility, nationally and internationally.
"Yet neither the public, nor we as public-health professionals, are
able to obtain validated, reliable information about the extent of
mortality and morbidity since the invasion of Iraq."
The statement is signed by 23 leading specialists from five countries
(the United States, Britain, Australia, Canada and Spain), led by Klim
McPherson, a visiting professor of epidemiology at the University of
Oxford.
The doctors pour scorn on the sole official toll, compiled by the
Iraqi ministry of health.
The BMJ said separately in a news report this lists 3,853 civilian
deaths and 15,517 injuries during the first six months of the war.
The signatories complained that the ministry is "likely seriously to
underestimate" the toll, as it only includes violence-related deaths
that are officially reported through the health system, nor mortality
from non-violent causes.
The October 2004 estimate of around 100,000 civilian deaths, published
in the British journal The Lancet, was based on interviews among
people in 988 households who were asked about deaths among their
families. The figures were then extrapolated nationally.
The British Foreign Office described The Lancet figures as unreliable
and said it had no legal responsibility under the Geneva Convention to
count civilian casualties, a position also taken by its ally, the US.
|
|
 |
| |
"Knowledge is
better than wealth because it protects you while you have to
guard wealth. it decreases if you keep on spending it but the
more you make use of knowledge ,the more it increases . what you
get through wealth disappears as soon as wealth disappears but
what you achieve through knowledge will remain even after you."MORE
..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|